7th August 2006
A number of carboxylic acids are used as cosmetics. Familiar to many readers will be glycolic acid. It’s used in over-the-counter “cosmeceuticals” to improve skin tone. Also used in professional “chemical peels” is trichloroacetic acid. These acids are all closely related to the familiar acetic acid, but they have “electronegative” substituents.
In the aqueous systems we’re talking about, the strength of an acid is related to its tendency to liberate protons. An acid’s tendency to dissociate into protons is related to the thermodynamic stability of its “conjugate base” - the acid, minus a proton. These electronegative substituents withdraw some electron density from the negative charge on the conjugate base, giving a more potent acid. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Biology, Medicine | No Comments »
4th August 2006
Here’s one many will have heard of - creatine. Most people know it as a bodybuilding supplement; it is used to add lean mass (from working out harder, and it’s contended, some intracellular water retention), as well as allow harder anaerobic workouts before failure. It’s the latter we’re interested in.
Creatine actually occurs endogenously, and it is synthesized by the liver. An enzyme called creatine kinase exists in the body to move a phosphate from ATP to creatine, making N-phosphocreatine and ADP. This reaction is not very thermodynamically favorable - you will only make 1 molecule of phosphocreatine for every 1000 molecules of ATP or so. This is good, because your body needs the ATP for other things (you’ve probably heard of ATP as the “universal energy currency” of the body) as well. Phosphorylation of creatine only happens when your body has a large excess of ATP.
The reverse reaction takes place too, and, as you might guess, phosphocreatine still would prefer to transfer its phosphate to ADP, regenerating ATP. It’s favored in the low-ATP regime - such as during the last repetition of a weightlifting set. This latter reaction is shown below:
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Biology, Medicine | No Comments »
3rd August 2006
Early readers will remember that one of my favorite things about artificial sweeteners is that they seem to often be discovered by accident. Apparently acesulfame is no exception:

Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Food, Biology | 2 Comments »
2nd August 2006
This one is a much larger molecule than we usually do, but it’s easy to forget that enzymes (and all proteins) are really just very large molecules. Taq polymerase is a DNA polymerase (DNA-copying enzyme) from the microorganism thermus aquaticus, a bacterium that lives in very hot water. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Biology, DNA, Medicine, Forensics | No Comments »
28th July 2006
This is a bizzare molecule. As I was discussing yesterday, structure-odor relationships are tricky. One very reliable predictor, though, is that the compounds of the later chalcogens (that is, compounds containing a sulfur, selenium, or tellurium atom) stink. Sulfur being the second most common member of this group after oxygen, this usually means thiols.
Thiols have a prodigous appetite for metal, especially mercury. This led to a second name for them: mercaptans (describing their ability to capture mercury).
All this leads up to a truly unusual thiol: grapefruit mercaptan. You’ll notice it looks like another terpene, like carvone and damascone. Grapefruit mercaptan is such a singular compound because it is a nice-smelling thiol. It’s another one I haven’t smelled, but I’m told it’s very complex and grapefruity. It’s also unique because not many things synthesize thiols on purpose (thiols being reactive and stinky - skunks are a notable exception here).
The Wikipedia article notes that this is a bit of a thorn in the flavor industry’s side - almost ALL thiols stink, and this is a notable exception. Thiols have a nasty habit of oxidizing to form dimers in the presence of oxygen (R-SH -> R-S-S-R), and even if grapefruit mercaptan doesn’t stink, its decomposition products probably do. All these leads to a not-so-hot flavoring agent.
Here’s the structure:

See you Monday.
Posted in Funny Names, Biology, Stinky, Perfumey | 2 Comments »
27th July 2006
I will admit to more than a casual fascination with smell. I am forever wafting vials of compounds for a whiff - which I get more and more flak for, as people get more and more cautious. I figure a few femtograms of small molecules here and there are the last thing that will do me in.
Perfumers (and biologists) still are looking for structure-odor rules, which prove to be continuously elusive. As I’ve mentioned before, one problem here is language; describing odor is hard! Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Biology, Perfumey | No Comments »
25th July 2006
Many of you have this in your homes. If you have those slow-dissolving tablets that leave a bleachy smell in your water, there’s a good chance you have N-chloro-N-bromo-dimethylhydantoin in one of those giant tablets in your toilet tank.
Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Hygeine, Poisons, Biology | 1 Comment »
24th July 2006
The vast majority of molecules you will ever see here don’t contain a metal ion. And so it goes for many chemists - myriad possibilities exist with just carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen - add in sulfur and the halogens and you have lifetimes of work for armies upon armies of chemists. The chemistry of metal compounds merits its own subfield, inorganic chemistry, which encompasses essentially the rest of the periodic table (plus the aforementioned atoms).
The number of possible molecules, as you can imagine, goes up sharply as you start putting other atoms in there, so many inorganic compounds are only known to inorganic chemists and those who work routinely with them. There are a few inorganic all-stars that every chemist will recognize, though. In synthesis, Grignard reagents are amazing compounds that are generated by the addition of magnesium (metal - you actually use bits of metal!) to alkyl halides. These are workhorses in organic chemistry, as are Grubbs’ Catalysts, a series of ruthenium complexes which won Grubbs the 2005 Nobel.
In biochemistry (and laundry science - more on that in a minute), the inorganic-complex forming hero is EDTA, or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid: Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Biology, Inorganic | 1 Comment »
21st July 2006
I’ll admit it - sometimes, when I have no idea what molecule to write up, I’ll look at the American Chemical Society’s Molecule of the Week Page. And sometimes I pick the one with a name that makes me smirk. Enter zingerone:

The name is easily dissected. Zingerone is a natural product from ginger. “Zinger” is ostensibly from the ineffable zest associated with ginger. “-one” is the suffix associated with the functional group known as a ketone.
As the ACS page notes, zingerone shares some common structural characteristics with capsaicin and vanillin:


Thinking like enters into it when a chemist looks at the structure and metabolic pathways leading to chemicals that plants make. The really weird stuff always seems to come from plants. There is a whole subfield of chemistry known as natural products chemistry devoted to studying this stuff. Plants, you see, are distinctly lacking in legs, fangs, claws, and guns, and they have had to make do with some (often strikingly toxic) chemical defenses. You see it in sea life, too, as in the case of fugu’s tetrodotoxin.
Vanillin (and I’d guess the other “vanillinoids”, but I’m not sure), are synthesized from two closely related amino acids, phenylalanine and tyrosine. As naturally occuring amino acids, they are ubiquitous, and find their way into all sorts of structures (since they’re relatively “cheap” to use).
Have a good weekend.
Posted in Food, Funny Names, Biology, Perfumey | No Comments »
17th July 2006
Dihydroxyacetone is a very, very simple sugar. It is produced by the splitting of hexoses (glucose and fructose) in glycolysis. Most people are interested in it, though, for its role in sunless tanners:

Many sugars, DHA included, can participate in a reaction called the Maillard reaction. In this reaction, sugars react with amino acids and proteins. This can result in brown pigments. DHA (sugar) reacts with skin proteins (amino acids/proteins), providing a rich brown pigment, if you’re lucky, or an orange pigment, if you’re not.
The same reaction responsible for sunless tanning results in meat browning (and flavor). Bizzare.
Night!
Posted in Food, Biology, Not Really a Molecule | No Comments »