<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polycarbonate (From greenhouse gas to eyeglass lens, CO2 does it all!)</title>
	<link>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/</link>
	<description>Molecules: You'd Better Learn to Live With Them</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: RG</title>
		<link>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-319</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 09:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-319</guid>
					<description>Will not the use of triphosgene lead to multiple links with Bisphenol giving rise to a &quot;three-dimensional&quot; network rather than a linear chain? Will such a crosslinked polymer be useful in applications where linear polymer fails - say heat resistance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will not the use of triphosgene lead to multiple links with Bisphenol giving rise to a &#8220;three-dimensional&#8221; network rather than a linear chain? Will such a crosslinked polymer be useful in applications where linear polymer fails - say heat resistance?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Naive Young Man</title>
		<link>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-291</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 04:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-291</guid>
					<description>I'd personally like to see a new method created for putting carbon dioxide into a solid form (even if it's chemically modified like this) - then we could take carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, chemically treat it into a solid form, and store it away in warehouses!   No more greenhouse gases.

And if we wanted to kill two birds with one stone...find a way to filter mercury out of water....and store it as mercury carbonate!

I'm a genius!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d personally like to see a new method created for putting carbon dioxide into a solid form (even if it&#8217;s chemically modified like this) - then we could take carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, chemically treat it into a solid form, and store it away in warehouses!   No more greenhouse gases.</p>
<p>And if we wanted to kill two birds with one stone&#8230;find a way to filter mercury out of water&#8230;.and store it as mercury carbonate!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a genius!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: motd</title>
		<link>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-239</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-239</guid>
					<description>You are probably right, but I really don't know my process chemistry, and I went with the easiest-to-understand route. Wikipedia says phosgene, but I'm not putting any bets on a Wiki entry. For the uninitiated, here is triphosgene :
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/images/triphosgene.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
It acts like three molecules of phosgene. The advantage is that it's not a gas. Still a violent poison, but you're less likely to breathe it in. There is also an analagous diphosgene (triphogene is a solid, diphosgene is a liquid, and phosgene is a gas).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are probably right, but I really don&#8217;t know my process chemistry, and I went with the easiest-to-understand route. Wikipedia says phosgene, but I&#8217;m not putting any bets on a Wiki entry. For the uninitiated, here is triphosgene :</p>
<div style="text-align: center"><img src="/images/triphosgene.gif" /></div>
<p>It acts like three molecules of phosgene. The advantage is that it&#8217;s not a gas. Still a violent poison, but you&#8217;re less likely to breathe it in. There is also an analagous diphosgene (triphogene is a solid, diphosgene is a liquid, and phosgene is a gas).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Reverend J</title>
		<link>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-238</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 2006 01:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/06/22/polycarbonate-from-greenhouse-gas-to-eyeglass-lens-co2-does-it-all/#comment-238</guid>
					<description>Not to nitpick but wouldn't they more likely to use triphosgene in the case of polymer synthesis?  It's a lot more stable, less toxic and solid, or was the original synthesis done with phosgene?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to nitpick but wouldn&#8217;t they more likely to use triphosgene in the case of polymer synthesis?  It&#8217;s a lot more stable, less toxic and solid, or was the original synthesis done with phosgene?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
