Comments on: Amygdalin (Cyanide: worst cancer cure ever.) http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/ Molecules: You'd Better Learn to Live With Them Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:44:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Mark A http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-6915 Sun, 03 Sep 2006 14:24:23 +0000 http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-6915 yes and for thousands of year Hippocrates taught that all of medicine can be learned from observation only. which meant for thousands of years 'physicians' practiced 'bloodletting' to treat all types of diseases (http://mouseasthma.blogspot.com/2006/08/asthma-tails-i.html), that doesn't make it right. as a young resident I felt the same way as Rod did about the use of magnesium in asthma. I thought that the drug companies were not interested in it because they couldn't make money. but when the studies were finally done, they showed there was no benefit. anecdotes and testimonials does not make a therapy effective and intuition is not an effective means to treat patients. yes and for thousands of year Hippocrates taught that all of medicine can be learned from observation only. which meant for thousands of years ‘physicians’ practiced ‘bloodletting’ to treat all types of diseases (http://mouseasthma.blogspot.com/2006/08/asthma-tails-i.html), that doesn’t make it right.

as a young resident I felt the same way as Rod did about the use of magnesium in asthma. I thought that the drug companies were not interested in it because they couldn’t make money. but when the studies were finally done, they showed there was no benefit. anecdotes and testimonials does not make a therapy effective and intuition is not an effective means to treat patients.

]]> by: motd http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-6564 Fri, 01 Sep 2006 04:54:56 +0000 http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-6564 Laetrile proponents: Please cite your source(s), I did. Laetrile proponents: Please cite your source(s), I did.

]]> by: Rod Czlok http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-6415 Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:19:03 +0000 http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-6415 The time has come for people to stop lying to the public and themselves; if you will not believe past scientific studies proving that Laetrile is one of the only therpaies which does work against cancer, then answer this question. If Laetrile is indeed a toxic drug; where are the deaths? 100,000 people died from Vioxx this is well documented. Where are the Laetrile deaths? You will not find them because Laetrile is uses selective toxicity based on the amount of beta glucosadaise present in the cancer cell. The rest as they say is smoke and mirrors. How do I know? If it were not so, if Laetrile was ineffective but was also not killing anyone, then who cares if a few thousand gullible cancer patients take it? The fact that so much effort and justice and a show of force has been expended should answer this question for you. The little voice in the back of you head knows it is the truth. But that voice does not hide behind clinical trials and molecular constructs, and neither should you. I cannot make you believe that this is the answer any more than I can make someone take the therapy; but I can challenge you to use your brain; use your intuition and what you know to be true about human nature. The time has come for people to stop lying to the public and themselves; if you will not believe past scientific studies proving that Laetrile is one of the only therpaies which does work against cancer, then answer this question. If Laetrile is indeed a toxic drug; where are the deaths? 100,000 people died from Vioxx this is well documented. Where are the Laetrile deaths? You will not find them because Laetrile is uses selective toxicity based on the amount of beta glucosadaise present in the cancer cell. The rest as they say is smoke and mirrors. How do I know? If it were not so, if Laetrile was ineffective but was also not killing anyone, then who cares if a few thousand gullible cancer patients take it? The fact that so much effort and justice and a show of force has been expended should answer this question for you. The little voice in the back of you head knows it is the truth. But that voice does not hide behind clinical trials and molecular constructs, and neither should you. I cannot make you believe that this is the answer any more than I can make someone take the therapy; but I can challenge you to use your brain; use your intuition and what you know to be true about human nature.

]]> by: jt http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-357 Mon, 03 Jul 2006 07:28:41 +0000 http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-357 To term it a drug is wrong, it is a food or nutrient similar to vitamins. Low levels in your body continuously is how it works, don't be in so much of a hurry to bag it. If you look into it it is a very subtle molecule. Harmless as amygdalin but deadly to a degree when split open. the enzyme to split it open are in abundance in cancer cells and yet nearly totally absent in all our normal cells. Then the enzyme to break down cyanide is present in all our normal cells but not in cancer cells. that is a way to fight cancer cells slowly, like when they first form. I have been eating apricot seeds for six years upto 100 at a time, with no side effects. I have also studied biological science at uni so i do have a good understanding of biochemistry. Either way to fight cancer the doctors will give you a poison, and chemo drugs are some of the most lethal molecules around. it is all a very contentious issue, the pharmaceutical companies want no research done into it because they can make zero money from it. nothing to patent and all you have to do is eat a few apricot seeds each day all your life and you should be cancer free. doesn't sit well with the stockholders have a healthy day To term it a drug is wrong, it is a food or nutrient similar to vitamins. Low levels in your body continuously is how it works, don’t be in so much of a hurry to bag it. If you look into it it is a very subtle molecule. Harmless as amygdalin but deadly to a degree when split open.
the enzyme to split it open are in abundance in cancer cells and yet nearly totally absent in all our normal cells. Then the enzyme to break down cyanide is present in all our normal cells but not in cancer cells. that is a way to fight cancer cells slowly, like when they first form.

I have been eating apricot seeds for six years upto 100 at a time, with no side effects. I have also studied biological science at uni so i do have a good understanding of biochemistry.

Either way to fight cancer the doctors will give you a poison, and chemo drugs are some of the most lethal molecules around.

it is all a very contentious issue, the pharmaceutical companies want no research done into it because they can make zero money from it. nothing to patent and all you have to do is eat a few apricot seeds each day all your life and you should be cancer free.

doesn’t sit well with the stockholders

have a healthy day

]]> by: Adam http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-27 Tue, 23 May 2006 23:20:16 +0000 http://www.moleculeoftheday.com/2006/05/23/amgdalin-cyanide-worst-cancer-cure-ever/#comment-27 Will the phrase "regular USP Snake Oil" become the "100% pure Florida quality evil" of the Web 2.0 generation? Only time will tell. Will the phrase “regular USP Snake Oil” become the “100% pure Florida quality evil” of the Web 2.0 generation? Only time will tell.

]]>